Importance of precautionary measures within the coercive procedure in Ecuador
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Public institutions in Ecuador have the legal power to establish coercive procedures against their debtors in order to recover their overdue portfolio, within these administrative processes, as well as in judicial processes, precautionary measures are ordered that are instruments of coercion suitable for the effective recovery of overdue values. Within the Ecuadorian legal framework there are appropriate regulations for the coercive process to be effective, but in procedural practice there are problems that affect the normal development of the procedure; Through logical analysis with the purpose of addressing the problems that arise in coercive procedural practice in the field of administrative law, based on the theoretical and regulatory framework, the types of precautionary measures that are issued in recovery processes via coercive, the procedural problems in practice that reduce its effectiveness will be evidenced and finally good practice recommendations will be established for effective coercive management that promotes the proper use of precautionary measures in order to increase the recovery rates of debts.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Derechos de autor
Las obras que se publican en 593 Digital Publisher CEIT están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1.1. 593 Digital Publisher CEIT, conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia Licencia Creative Commons 4.0 de Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0, por lo cual se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que:
1.1.a. Se cite la autoría y fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial, URL).
1.1.b. No se usen para fines comerciales u onerosos.
1.1.c. Se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
Juan Pablo Aguirre-Ramírez, Universidad Indoamérica - Ecuador
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1728-0259
Titles and Academic Degrees:
Bachelor of Public and Social Sciences.
Lawyer of the Courts and Tribunals of the Republic of Ecuador.
Juris Doctor.
Senior Specialist in Financial, Stock Market and Insurance Law.
Research:
Chapter:
Civil and Commercial Society within Ecuadorian legislation, doctoral thesis, Quito, Ecuador, 2005.
Diana Gabriela D’Ambrocio-Camacho , Universidad Indoamérica - Ecuador
Titles and Academic Degrees:
Bachelor of Public and Social Sciences.
Lawyer of the Courts and Tribunals of the Republic.
Doctor of Jurisprudence.
Master in Legal Sciences of the Administration of Justice.
Diploma in Constitutional Law.
Master in Criminal Procedure Law ©
Phd candidate. by the Pontifical Catholic University of Argentina ©
Measurer accredited by the Pichincha Bar Association with the endorsement of the San Francisco University.
Research:
Article
Commutative justice and the principle of the synalagma in employment contracts in relation to job stability. 593 Digital Publisher CEIT, 6(2-2), 144-170. https://doi.org/10.33386/593dp.2021.2-2.516.
Chapter:
Legal-civil liability and prevention of normative basis in the workplace that condemns the delinquent employer. Chapter of the book "Rights in the Ecuadorian Constitution of 2008. Contributions from multidisciplinarity”, Editorial CEP, Quito, Ecuador, 2020, ISBN: 978-9942-10-589-9.
References
Carrión Rubio, I. M.(2020). Levantamiento del Velo Societario en la Jurisdicción Coactiva (Doctoral dissertation, Quito: Universidad de Los Hemisferios 2020).
Luis Adrián Serrano Chica, El procedimiento coactivo en la legislación ecuatoriana de los últimos años (2005-2018), y su régimen en el código orgánico administrativo, Artículo Original (Miscelánea) RFJ, No. 4, 2018, pp. 107-115, publicado por Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador.
Guerrero Izurieta, D. N. (2018). La Potestad Coactiva De La Administración En El Ordenamiento Jurídico Ecuatoriano (Bachelor's thesis).
Merino, R. B. (2020). Alcances de la presunción de licitud en el procedimiento administrativo sancionador. Derecho & Sociedad, 1(54), 267-276.
Coello Jácome, C. D. (2019). Las medidas cautelares dentro del proceso contencioso administrativo (Master's thesis, Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, Sede Ecuador).
Base legal
Código Orgánico Administrativo. (2017). Segundo Suplemento Registro Oficial 31, 7-VII-2017.
Constitución de la República del Ecuador. (2008). Registro Oficial No. 449, 20 de Octubre 2008.