Violation of Administrative Principles and Rights During the Ordinary Auction of Assets in Coactive Proceedings

Main Article Content

Paula Andrea Álvarez-Abril
Elizabeth Cristina Vega-Crespo

Abstract

The problem that was analyzed in this article is the breach of the provisions of Art. 300 and following of the Organic Administrative Code by public institutions, referring to the implementation of a computer platform in the notification phase in the ordinary auction and the presentation of bids virtually. The approach used was qualitative, using the research of web pages of institutions such as Ban Ecuador, Ministry of Labor, BIESS, CFN and Banco del Pacífico.


As a result, it was obtained that certain public institutions have violated Art. 300 of the COA and following as well as the principles and administrative rights within the coercive procedures. It was concluded that the institutions by not complying with the current regulations on the computer platform will have several consequences, one of them being the stagnation of coercive trials, causing the violation of administrative principles and rights; that is why it is suggested for the proper development of coercive processes, the creation of a single auction platform where each institution raises the upload the information of the goods to be auctioned and the possibility of the interested parties to present bids online.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Álvarez-Abril, P., & Vega-Crespo, E. (2022). Violation of Administrative Principles and Rights During the Ordinary Auction of Assets in Coactive Proceedings. 593 Digital Publisher CEIT, 7(6-1), 267-282. https://doi.org/10.33386/593dp.2022.6-1.1531
Section
Law
Author Biographies

Paula Andrea Álvarez-Abril, Universidad Católica de Cuenca - Ecuador

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2803-2752

  • Lawyer of the Courts of Justice of the Republic and Degree in Political and Social Sciences from the University of Cuenca.
  • Certified as Operator of the National Public Procurement System, issued by the National Public Procurement Service - SERCOP (2021)

 

As a professional I have worked:

  • In several law firms, I was a lawyer sir, junior and legal assistant, in various branches of law, the most outstanding being administrative law, tasks that I did approximately five years.
  • In FUNDER, I was a facilitator in the administrative processes for the creation of savings and credit banks, in addition to providing professional support in bidding contracts in the public procurement portal, tasks that I carried out approximately a year and a half.
  • I am currently working in the Rectory within the Catholic University of Cuenca.
  • Currently graduated from the Master's Degree in Administrative Law Mention Public Procurement at the Catholic University of Cuenca.

Elizabeth Cristina Vega-Crespo, Universidad Católica de Cuenca - Ecuador

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1145-7159

Academic training: 

 

  • Doctor of Jurisprudence and Lawyer of the Courts of Justice of Ecuador 

 

  • Tax Specialist 

 

  • Master in Tax Law 

 

  • Certified as Operator of the National Public Procurement System, in the role of: Legal Responsible, issued by the National Public Procurement Service - SERCOP (2018) 

 

 

  • Certified as Operator of the National Public Procurement System, issued by the National Public Procurement Service - SERCOP (2021) 

 

 

As a professional I have worked: 

 

  • As Legal Assistant Manager of the Municipal Public Company of Telecommunications, Potable Water, Sewerage and Sanitation of the Basin, ETAPA EP  

 

  • In the Strategic Public Company CELEC EP, I have held positions such as Legal Specialist, General Secretary in Charge and Head of Public Procurement 

 

  • I currently work as Legal Director at the Centrosur Regional Electric Company 

 

 

  • I permanently participate as a teacher and instructor in several Universities, Public and Private Institutions in the field of public procurement 

 

 

  • I am currently tutoring some scientific articles within the Master's Degree in Administrative Law with a Mention in Public Procurement at the Catholic University of Cuenca. 

References

​Berrocal Guerrero, L. E. (2009). Manual del Acto Administrativo. Bogotá: Librería Ediciones .

Luna Serrano, A. (2015). ProQuest Ebook Central. Obtenido de La seguridad jurídica y las verdades oficiales del derecho: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uasbsp/.

Pérez Luño, A. E. (1994). La Seguridad Jurídica. Barcelona: Ariel S.A.

Toscano Soria, L. A. (2006). Procedimientos administrativos y contenciosos . Quito: Pudeleco editores S.A.

Andrade, Y. (2018). El proceso coativo en la legislación ecuatoriana. El proceso coativo en la legislación ecuatoriana. Quito: Ediciones Legales.

Asamblea Nacional. (7 de Julio de 2017). Código Orgánico Administrativo. Quito, Ecuador: Segundo Suplemento – Registro Oficial Nº 31.

Asamblea Nacional Constituyente. (20 de Octubre de 2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador. Montecristi: Registro Oficial 449.

Banco del Pacífico - Corporación Financiera Nacional. (23 de Marzo de 2019). Remate CFN Y Banco del Pacífico. Obtenido de https://remates.cfn.fin.ec

Biess. (Febrero de 2020). Biess Coactiva. Obtenido de https://www.biess.fin.ec/servicio-al-cliente/coactiva

Bonnin, C. J., & Guerrero , O. (2021). Principio de administración pública. Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Calsamiglia Blancafort, A. (2017). Eficiencia y Derecho. Barcelona: Doxa 4.

Camacho Cepeda, G. (2000). Los principios de eficacia y eficiencia administrativa. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Conosur Ltda.

Cassagne, J. C. (2013). El Acto Administrativo (2da ed.). Bogotá: Temis.

Congreso Nacional. (12 de Julio de 2005). Código de Procedimiento Civil. Registro Oficial Suplemento 58.

Dromi, R. J. (2001). Derecho administrativo (9na ed.). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial de ciencias y cultura.

Ecuador, B. (9 de Octubre de 2015). Ban Ecuador. Obtenido de https://www.banecuador.fin.ec/

Larousse Editorial. (1956). Diccionario de la Lengua Españolaç (22 ed., Vol. I). Madrid: Larousse Editorial.

Ministerio de Trabajo. (Febrero de 2020). Ministerio de Trabajo. Obtenido de https://www.trabajo.gob.ec/avisos-de-remate/

Ministerio de Trabajo. (Febrero de 2020). Ministerio de Trabajo. Obtenido de https://www.trabajo.gob.ec/direccion-regional-de-trabajo-y-servicio-publico-de-cuenca-fase-3-2021/

Monroy, A. (2016). Memorias de las Jornadas Ecuatorianas de Derecho Tributario. Cuenca.

Montaño Galarza, M. A. (2011). El Procedimiento Administrativo. Loja, Ecuador: Universidad Técnica .

Parejo, A. L. (1995). Eficacia y Administración (1ra ed.). Madrid, España: Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública, Boletín Oficial del Estado.

Ponce Cabezas, C. L. (2016). Análisis jurídco de la coactiva en Ecuador ¿Juicio o trámite administrativo? Guayaquil: Universidad Católica de Santiado de Guayaquil.

Torres Hernández, Z. (2014). Teoria General de la Adminstración (Vol. 2). Tlihuacan: Patria S.A de C.V.

Urgiles Merchán, E. J. (04 de Julio de 2014). Universidad Andina Simón Bolivar. Obtenido de Proceso Coactivo en la Administracion Tributaria Central del Ecuador (SRI) y su impacto en la recaudación: https://repositorio.uasb.edu.ec/bitstream/10644/3922/1/T1420-MT-Urgiles-Proceso.pdf

Vaquer Caballeria, M. (2011). El criterio de la eficiencia del Derecho Administrativo. Obtenido de Dialnet: file:///C:/Users/ASUS/Downloads/Dialnet-ElCriterioDeLaEficienciaEnElDerechoAdministrativo-3802821.pdf